Fact or Fiction? Horticultural Lighting Questions Answered

Jillian Whitehead

Horticulture, LED luminaires, Sustainability | March 4, 2021

There are a lot of claims out there about LED and HID lighting, and as manufacturers of both, we always try to show the complete picture. In this article, we try and debunk some common statements made about both LED and HID lighting to help you make better decisions when it comes to grow light systems.

Fact or Fiction: Is there a 1:1 replacement with HPS to LED lighting?

While an LED may have the same light output as an HID luminaire, the way the light is distributed over a grow space differs between the two technologies, making an exact swap of an HID luminaire with an LED luminaire a little more challenging.

When a manufacturer is making the claim that an LED luminaire can be directly switched out 1-for-1 in an existing 1000W HID install, the grower should insist that the lighting manufacturer guarantee the same light intensity and uniformity throughout the entire grow area. The caution is that, although an LED luminaire may put out an equivalent amount of light to an HID luminaire, the distribution of that light from the LED will likely be nowhere near the same as with the HID reflector technology. So the grower will likely end up with poorer uniformity, if you’re looking at the area as a whole.  If you refer to our blog article on light uniformity, where we compare both HID and LED luminaires, you can see that in most cases you will need more LEDs to achieve the same uniformity and light intensity.  In many cases, extra track or truss may also be needed to hang the LED luminaires, because each style and type of luminaire distributes light differently, so placement will likely need to be adjusted. So, in most cases, replacing an HID luminaire with an LED and expecting the same results, is unlikely due to differences in the way light is distributed and placement of the luminaires.

In most cases, replacing an HID luminaire with an LED and expecting the same results, is unlikely due to differences in the way light is distributed and placement of the luminaires

Fact or Fiction: Water or fan cooled LED luminaires – which are better for thermal management?

There are two main ways LED manufacturers cool their lights, either “passively” by dissipating heat through conduction and convection paths, like with the HortiLED Top 2.0, or by using “active” cooling methods like water or fans.  Both are designed to manage the heat load by dissipating heat generated by the luminaire, away from the crop.  The difference is that actively cooled LEDs can be a bigger overall risk and more complicated to manage, particularly so for water-cooled luminaires.  Water cooled LEDs are also currently not approved by DLC for horticultural applications, so those looking to receive rebates will be out of luck. There may be an option in the next set of guidelines due this summer (2021) but it will require a minimum rated lifetime of 10 years for the cooling system.

As mentioned, water cooled units are more complicated; this is because they require extra plumbing work and chillers to cool down the heated water after the LED light sources. Water can also accelerate the corrosion of metal parts leading to failure and poor light output – in fact, a poorly designed water-cooling system will damage the light after a few years.

Biological growth can also deposit on the grow light water channels and tubes, impairing heat dissipation.  In addition, if a water pump fails, or someone switches on the system without water circulation, it can lead to catastrophic failure of the LEDs.  So, while water may be a good way to cool down a light unit, it poses many disadvantages and requires extra work and infrastructure. With fan cooled luminaires, the fans usually fail long before the rated lifetime of the LEDs requiring early repairs at best and a redundant lighting system at worst.


Fact or Fiction: Is there a perfect light spectrum for plant growth?

As of right now, there is no “perfect” light spectrum for any particular crop type.  While many researchers and growers are learning more about what combination of light spectrums works best, there is no “one size fits all”.  One species growth can differ from another (even within the same cultivar) under the same light spectrum. For this reason, we typically recommend growers use broad spectrum LED luminaires, which emit a wide range of wavelengths to meet the needs of the plant throughout the different growth stages, in sole-source applications. For greenhouse applications, a fixed spectrum with peaks in the red and blue wavelengths, offers the optimal balance between energy efficiencies and crop growth and production. For more customized LED recipes, we often advise growers to first trial the LEDs in a small section of their grow, to see how their crops perform under those spectrums and to determine any necessary environmental adjustments.


Fact or Fiction: You cannot use HID luminaires for vertical and/or close-to-ceiling applications

While this may be true for very close tiered applications, where the lights are mounted 1-2 feet away from a crop, many growers are able to use HID luminaires (HPS, MH and CMH), in vertical or close-ceiling applications, when installed 3 feet or more from the crop.  This is because HID manufacturers have engineered low-profile luminaires (such as our NXT-LP) specifically for applications where mounting heights are limited.  In fact, we have worked with growers of different crops including leafy greens and cannabis who successfully utilize HID luminaires in a tiered racking system.  To avoid burning the crop, best practices are to install them 3 feet or more from the crop.

In addition, CMH (ceramic metal halide) lamps have a lower wattage and lower heat output, making them better suited to vertical racking, and close to canopy installations.  In addition, the “white” broad spectrum light emitted by CMH, makes it easier to work in in sole source applications.

You can successfully grow a variety crops with HID technology in close ceiling applications.

Fact or Fiction: LEDs change the growing environment

When swapping out your HPS luminaires for LEDs, growers will likely need to alter their growing environment to compensate for environmental changes.  Areas of your grow that could be affected include irrigation, nutrient management, pest and disease management, humidity and heating.

Due to the lack of heat from LEDs, the grow space will be naturally cooler, which has its benefits and drawbacks.  For growers in northern climates, it means compensating for heating in the winter.   In some cases, due to the lack of heat from the lights, LED environments can be less humid, which is a great thing when it comes to HVAC loads, but can affect crop growth. Humidity levels need to be maintained, especially during young plant stages, to keep nutrient movement through the plant and prevent nutrient issues. Not maintaining appropriate humidity levels can lead to problems such as blossom end rot, tip burn and other physiological disorders.  This is because you need enough to keep transpiration rates up to ensure movement of nutrients through your plant and is especially important in plants that can be prone to calcium deficiency disorders, such as vine crops and lettuces.  Air flow is also important, and even though you may have lower temperatures, you still need fans, venting and/or air movement to ensure continuous gas exchange, particularly in crops with high densities like lettuces.


Fact or Fiction: LEDs have a better environmental footprint

LEDs are great when it comes to energy savings compared to legacy lighting technologies. However, depending on the type of set up you have, for instance a large vertical system, it can actually produce more CO2 than a field farm due to increased operating costs including lighting, dehumidification and cooling.  Not only that, but unlike HID luminaires which can work for decades just by replacing a lamp every few years, LED luminaires need to be entirely replaced if failure occurs due to faulty components or poor quality, meaning there can be more waste versus a traditional lighting system.

We are not saying that HID technology or field grown crops have a better carbon footprint than LEDs, but that many times claims can be made to look too good to be true until you look at the whole picture.  We believe LED lighting can pave the way for a more sustainable way to grow food, but many factors need to be considered in order to reach that sustainability.

The financial benefits of a transition to LEDs will depend on the energy and environmental costs associated with the application – in many cases a hyrbid LED-HPS system can provide the best benefits.

Fact or Fiction: Do LEDs offer higher energy savings?

Finally, do LEDs help me save more money?  As we know, LEDs typically use much less energy than traditional systems, and many states and provinces also offer utility rebates for operations that install eligible LEDs to help to offset the capex costs.  However, many new LED luminaires that boast very high light output, also have an input power of 1000W meaning they consume the same amount of energy as a 1000W HID luminaire. Given the directional nature of LEDs, that light cannot be spread over a bigger surface area, so you won’t be able to get away with using fewer luminaires if you want to maintain good light uniformity.

Also, depending on your geography, you may need to add extra heating in winter to make up for the radiant heat you would get from HPS technology.  Many growers we work with in cold climates rely on heat from the HPS luminaires to light their heat loving crops like tomatoes, cucumbers, cannabis and flowers.

In a recent study by Wageningen University, they set out to see how much energy is saved with an LED system versus an HPS system in a greenhouse application, when considering additional heating costs.  They found that LEDs will reduce electricity costs by around 40%, but will increase heating by 25%, making energy savings around 15%.  So, the financial benefits of a transition to LEDs will depend on the energy and environmental costs associated with the application.  This study helps demonstrate that in order to understand the true energy savings of LEDs, you must look at the whole picture and include other areas of energy usage that can be affected by a switch in lighting technologies.